Tennessee Supreme Court rules for Tinsley Properties in quarry zoning dispute
T he Tennessee Supreme Court has unanimously ruled in favor of Tinsley Properties, LLC and Tinsley Sand & Gravel, LLC in Tinsley Properties, LLC et al. v. Grundy County, Tennessee, invalidating a county resolution that restricted the company’s quarry operations.
In its opinion, the Court applied Tennessee’s longstanding “substantial effects” test and concluded that Grundy County’s resolution functioned as a zoning ordinance rather than an administrative action. Because the resolution imposed land-use restrictions with zoning-level impacts, the Court held it was subject to the procedural requirements of the County Zoning Act, which were not followed.
“We appreciate the Tennessee Supreme Court’s careful consideration of the legal issues in this case and believe the ruling provides important clarity for property owners and local governments alike,” said Clifton N. Miller, COO/CLO of Tinsley Companies.
“The Court’s decision confirms that zoning actions must comply with established state zoning laws.”
This decision allows Tinsley to move forward with serving the local community and the wider region by providing high-quality building materials essential for public infrastructure and private development projects. Our operations will support economic growth and job creation throughout Grundy County and the surrounding areas for generations “At Tinsley, we believe strong communities are built on collaboration and trust,” said Peter Tinsley, CEO/ President. “We look forward to working alongside local officials and residents to ensure that our operations contribute positively to Grundy County for years to come.”
“Tinsley has long been part of this community, and we take that responsibility seriously,” Tinsley added. “We are committed to open communication and to working cooperatively with county officials and our neighbors to ensure our operations are conducted responsibly and with respect for the community.”



